Weaning failure due to isolated residual diaphragmatic paralysis after cervical spinal cord ischemia following aortic surgery- a case report (2024)

  • Remco Overbeek1,
  • Amelie Behrens2,
  • David Zopfs3,
  • Spyridon Mylonas2,
  • Bernhard Dorweiler2,
  • Fabian Dusse1,
  • Bernd W. Böttiger1 &
  • Sandra Emily Stoll1

BMC Anesthesiology volume24, Articlenumber:241 (2024) Cite this article

  • 165 Accesses

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Background

Bilateral diaphragmatic dysfunction can lead to dyspnea and recurrent respiratory failure. In rare cases, it may result from high cervical spinal cord ischemia (SCI) due to anterior spinal artery syndrome (ASAS). We present a case of a patient experiencing persistent isolated diaphragmatic paralysis after SCI at level C3/C4 following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Kommerell’s diverticulum. This is, to our knowledge, the first documented instance of a patient fully recovering from tetraplegia due to SCI while still exhibiting ongoing bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis.

Case presentation

The patient, a 67-year-old male, presented to the Vascular Surgery Department for surgical treatment of symptomatic Kommerell’s diverticulum in an aberrant right subclavian artery. After successful surgery in two stages, the patient presented with respiratory insufficiency and flaccid tetraparesis consistent with anterior spinal artery syndrome with maintained sensibility of all extremities. A computerized tomography scan (CT) revealed a high-grade origin stenosis of the left vertebral artery, which was treated by angioplasty and balloon-expandable stenting. Consecutively, the tetraparesis immediately resolved, but weaning remained unsuccessful requiring tracheostomy. Abdominal ultrasound revealed a residual bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis. A repeated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 14 days after vertebral artery angioplasty confirmed SCI at level C3/C4. The patient was transferred to a pulmonary clinic with weaning center for further recovery.

Conclusions

This novel case highlights the need to consider diaphragmatic paralysis due to SCI as a cause of respiratory failure in patients following aortic surgery. Diaphragmatic paralysis may remain as an isolated residual in these patients.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Bilateral diaphragmatic dysfunction is a known, yet underdiagnosed cause of dyspnea and recurrent respiratory failure. It is usually caused by chest or neck surgery, neck injury, manipulation of the cervical spine, neuromuscular diseases or cardiac surgery [1]. In some instances, diaphragmatic paralysis may be caused by high cervical spinal cord ischemia (SCI) due to anterior spinal artery syndrome (ASAS). The anterior spinal artery runs ventrally along the entire length of the spinal cord and supplies its anterior two-thirds [2]. Ischemic infarction due to direct occlusion or hypoperfusion of feeding arteries can lead to ASAS [3]. Only a few cases have been described where diaphragmatic paralysis persisted, while tetraplegia receded after SCI [4]. This is, to our knowledge, the first patient fully recovering from tetraplegia due to SCI continuing to present bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis resulting in weaning failure from mechanical ventilation.

Case report

A 67-year-old male caucasian patient presented to the Vascular Surgery Department for surgical treatment of symptomatic Kommerell’s diverticulum in an aberrant right subclavian artery. Progressive ho*rseness was described for at least the last 6 months combined with upper thoracic pain the last two weeks The patient had a history of endarterectomy of the left and right carotid artery (lefts side 5 months and right side 18 years before), respectively, for high-grade asymptomatic carotid stenosis in another hospital. In addition, the patient had suffered from a previous stroke (9 years before). Due to the complexity of the anatomy and after intedersciplinary case discussion in our aortic board (cardiac surgeons, vascular surgeons, anesthesiologists, cardiologists) an urgent hybrid approach in tho stages was chosen. Informed consent was obtained from the patient and a transposition of the right vertebral and subclavian arteries to the right common carotid artery was undertaken. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and three days later, the second step with a left-sided carotid-subclavian bypass combined with an endovascular exclusion (implantation of a thoracic aortic stentgraft and a vascular plug in the proximal left subclavian artery) of the Kommerell’s diverticulum was successfully performed. In the immediate postoperative course the patient could be extubated without neurological deficits. On the second postoperative day the patient developed a complete flaccid tetraplegia with reduced reflexes in the left arm and increased reflexes in the remaining limbs. Additionally, the patient developed progressive respiratory failure requiring reintubation. The immediately performed computed tomographyangiography (CTA) detected a flow-limiting dissection of the proximal right vertebral artery and a high-grade origin stenosis of the left vertebral artery (Fig.1).

3D reconstruction of the postoperative CT (computed tomography) angiography. The thoracic stent prosthesis (*), the vascular plug implanted in the left proximal subclavian artery (dashed arrow) and the bypass between the common carotid artery and the subclavian artery (arrow) are shown. In addition, the high-grade stenosis of the left vertebral artery can be seen

Full size image

After consultation of the neurologists and neuroradiologists the suspicion of cervical spinal cord ischemia as cause of tetraparesis was raised and an angioplasty with stenting of the left vertebral artery was conducted (Fig.2).

Transbrachial digital subtraction angiography of the left subclavian artery after retrograde distal brachial artery access. A high-grade stenosis of the vertebral artery near the origin (A, left side) is shown (arrow). The stenosis was treated by percutaneous trans-luminal angioplasty (balloon-PTA and stenting), resulting in a significant reduction of the stenosis (B, right side)

Full size image

The tetraplegia was fully reversible thereafter, but the patient continued to present with bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis (absent diaphragmatic thickening / diaphragmatic elevation in abdominal ultrasound) (Fig.3, Video of ultrasound of left and right diaphragm).

Ultrasound of the left diaphragm: No diaphragmatic thickening and elevation was detected

Full size image

Subsequently, weaning attempts remained futile, leading to the decision to perform a tracheostomy. The initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan one day after vertebral artery angioplasty showed no signs of SCI. A cerebral CT did not show any signs of infarction or bleeding (Fig.4). However, a follow-up MRI scan after 2 weeks showed findings consistent with segmental SCI at level C3/C4 (Fig.5).

Unremarkable axial CT images one day prior to angiographic treatment of the vertebral artery stenosis. Levels: (1) brain stem (5mm slice thickness), (2) mesencpehalon, (3) pons, (4) medulla oblongata (all 1mm slice thickness)

Full size image

Left: MRI of the cervical spine in sagittal slice orientation. Diffusion-weighted sequence (A), and T2 sequence (B) show no evidence of spinal ischemia. Right: Follow-Up MRI of the cervical spine in sagittal slice orientation. A dot-shaped diffusion restriction (white arrow) is seen in the diffusion-weighted sequences (A2) with a hyperintense correlate (yellow arrow) in the T2 sequence (B2) at the level of the fourth cervical vertebral body, consistent with spinal ischemia

Full size image

The patient was eventually transferred to a pulmonary clinic with a specialised weaning center for further recovery. Three months after the patient’s discharge, bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis remained unchanged.

Discussion and conclusions

Due to the rarity and heterogeneity of high cervical SCI, to date definite treatment options are lacking and therapeutic recommendations are mostly based on supportive measures to increase arterial perfusion of the spinal cord [5, 6]. Medical management options of spinal cord ischemia include treatment with thrombolysis and early corticosteroid administration for improved functional recovery, though it remains unclear whether this advantage extends to individuals with vascular cord ischemia [7, 8]. When the patient initially presented with tetraplegia, the differential diagnosis for SCI included Guillain-Barré syndrome, hypokalemic periodic paralysis, and ischemic stroke of the posterior circulation. All of the least diagnoses could be ruled out via cerebral angiogram/CT scan, normal potassium levels and the clinical picture and progress of the case. A cerebral MRI might have been beneficial in ruling out cerebral infarction and could have been applied parallel to cervical MRI to detect SCI [9], but the second pathological cervical MRI scan fully explained the acute onset and the clinical picture of SCI.

In this case the spinal perfusion was impaired by the high-grade stenosis of the vertebral artery. The decision to perform balloon dilatation and stent implantation was made due to the severity of symptoms, the acute onset and the vertebral artery stenosis as a treatable cause. Clinical trials have highlighted the safety and efficacy of endovascular therapy for treating vertebral artery stenosis, though there is still limited evidence demonstrating the superiority of endovascular treatment over the best medical management [10, 11].

A high SCI affecting level C3 to C5 can cause damage to the phrenic nerves leading to diaphragmatic paralysis, as presented in our case in the form of weaning failure from the ventilator [12]. While diaphragmatic dysfunction is a frequent complication observed in cardiac surgery, primarily caused by direct phrenic nerve injury resulting from hypothermia or mechanical trauma [3], it is very uncommon to result from SCI. In this case, suspicion of SCI arose when the patient developed tetraparesis consistent with symptoms of ASAS. Since the patient failed to be weaned from the ventilator and presented an abnormal breathing pattern mainly using his auxiliary respiratory and abdominal muscles for ventilation, an abdominal ultrasound was performed. This finally unveiled bilateral diapgragmatic paralysis without diaphragmatic elevation. At this point, the tetraplegia had fully resolved and the patient presented neurologically unremarkable, leaving the diaphragmatic paralysis as the only residual damage. To our knowledge, comparable cases have not yet been described in literature.

Diagnosing phrenic nerve paralysis can be challenging, especially when the pathogenesis is as complex as in this case. On suspicion of phrenic nerve paralysis, diagnostic procedures in addition to patients past medical history should include physical examination, blood gas analysis, lung function testing and diagnosis of the underlying disease. This should be followed by specific respiratory muscle testing and respiratory imaging such as diaphragmatic ultrasound [13]. In this case, paralysis was diagnosed by abdominal ultrasound, revealing a flat, non-thickening, non-contracting diaphragm bilaterally. Abdominal ultrasound is an easy, non-invasive and cost-efficient way to assess and reevaluate diaphragmatic function [14].

Due to the patient’s clinical presentation, prolonged weaning was expected, and early tracheostomy was performed which has been associated with shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, shorter length of ICU stay and fewer laryngotracheal complications in patients with traumatic SCI [15]. Future therapeutic options for the patient could include inspiratory respiratory muscle training [16] and intrathoracic phrenic pacing [17]. Current expert opinion recommends reassessing recovery of the phrenic nerve and diaphragm after a time- period of 3 to 6 months after the initial injury. The need for a pacer for phrenic nerve stimulation should be reevaluated after this period. [18].

Our case demonstrates that weaning failure after aortic surgery may be caused by diaphragmatic paralysis due to cervical SCI. Of note, diaphragmatic paralysis may remain as an isolated residual in these patients.

Data availability

The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

SCI:

Spinal Cord Ischemia

TEVAR:

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

CT:

Computerized Tomography Scan

MRI:

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

ASAS:

Anterior Spinal Artery Syndrome

References

  1. McCool FD, Tzelepis GE. Dysfunction of the diaphragm. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(10):932–42.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Santillan A, Nacarino V, Greenberg E, Riina HA, Gobin YP, Patsalides A. Vascular anatomy of the spinal cord. J Neurointerv Surg. 2012;4(1):67–74.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Foo D, Rossier AB. Anterior spinal artery syndrome and its natural history. Paraplegia. 1983;21(1):1–10.

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matsumoto H, Nakayama T, Hamaguchi H, Nakamori T, Ikagawa T, Oda T, et al. Diaphragmatic paralysis in a patient with spinal cord infarction. Intern Med. 2009;48(19):1763–6.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Caton MTHJ. Spinal Cord Ischemia. [Updated 2023 Feb 7]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539870/.

  6. Aucoin VJ, Eagleton MJ, Farber MA, Oderich GS, Schanzer A, Timaran CH, et al. Spinal cord protection practices used during endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms by the U.S. Aortic Research Consortium. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73(1):323–30.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Holford TR, Leo-Summers L, Aldrich EF, Fazl M, et al. Administration of methylprednisolone for 24 or 48 hours or tirilazad mesylate for 48 hours in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Results of the Third National Acute spinal cord Injury Randomized Controlled Trial. National Acute spinal cord Injury Study. JAMA. 1997;277(20):1597–604.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lee K, Strozyk D, Rahman C, Lee LK, Fernandes EM, Claassen J, et al. Acute spinal cord ischemia: treatment with intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis, hyperbaric oxygen and hypothermia. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;29(1):95–8.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Nouh A, Remke J, Ruland S. Ischemic posterior circulation stroke: a review of anatomy, clinical presentations, diagnosis, and current management. Front Neurol. 2014;5:30.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  10. Markus HS, Larsson SC, Kuker W, Schulz UG, Ford I, Rothwell PM, et al. Stenting for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis: the vertebral artery ischaemia stenting trial. Neurology. 2017;89(12):1229–36.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  11. Coward LJ, McCabe DJ, Ederle J, Featherstone RL, Clifton A, Brown MM. Long-term outcome after angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis compared with medical treatment in the carotid and vertebral artery transluminal angioplasty study (CAVATAS): a randomized trial. Stroke. 2007;38(5):1526–30.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Ricoy J, Rodríguez-Núñez N, Álvarez-Dobaño JM, Toubes ME, Riveiro V, Valdés L. Diaphragmatic dysfunction. Pulmonology. 2019;25(4):223–35.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Windisch W, Schönhofer B, Magnet FS, Stoelben E, Kabitz HJ. [Diagnosis and treatment of diaphragmatic dysfunction]. Pneumologie. 2016;70(7):454–61.

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Summerhill EM, El-Sameed YA, Glidden TJ, McCool FD. Monitoring recovery from diaphragm paralysis with ultrasound. Chest. 2008;133(3):737–43.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Romero J, Vari A, Gambarrutta C, Oliviero A. Tracheostomy timing in traumatic spinal cord injury. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(10):1452–7.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  16. Göhl O, Walker DJ, Walterspacher S, Langer D, Spengler CM, Wanke T, et al. [Respiratory muscle training: state of the art]. Pneumologie. 2016;70(1):37–48.

    PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Le Pimpec-Barthes F, Gonzalez-Bermejo J, Hubsch JP, Duguet A, Morélot-Panzini C, Riquet M, et al. Intrathoracic phrenic pacing: a 10-year experience in France. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142(2):378–83.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  18. DiMarco AF. Diaphragm pacing. Clin Chest Med. 2018;39(2):459–71.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. We acknowledge support for the Article Processing Charge from the DFG (German Research Foundation, 491454339).

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany

    Remco Overbeek,Fabian Dusse,Bernd W. Böttiger&Sandra Emily Stoll

  2. Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany

    Amelie Behrens,Spyridon Mylonas&Bernhard Dorweiler

  3. Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany

    David Zopfs

Authors

  1. Remco Overbeek

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  2. Amelie Behrens

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  3. David Zopfs

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  4. Spyridon Mylonas

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  5. Bernhard Dorweiler

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  6. Fabian Dusse

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  7. Bernd W. Böttiger

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  8. Sandra Emily Stoll

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

Contributions

AB, RO and SES conducted the patient’s chart reviews and checked for patient’s consent. AB and RO wrote the first draft of this manuscript. SES, SM, FD, BD, DZ, BWB revised the manuscript. All the authors reviewed the final draft of the manuscript and agreed on submitting it to Critical Care. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Remco Overbeek.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Ethics approval was granted by the ethics committee of the University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (23-1338-retro).

Consent for publication

Complete written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this study and accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Weaning failure due to isolated residual diaphragmatic paralysis after cervical spinal cord ischemia following aortic surgery- a case report (6)

Cite this article

Overbeek, R., Behrens, A., Zopfs, D. et al. Weaning failure due to isolated residual diaphragmatic paralysis after cervical spinal cord ischemia following aortic surgery- a case report. BMC Anesthesiol 24, 241 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02626-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02626-2

Keywords

  • Weaning failure
  • Spinal ischemia
  • Diaphragmatic paralysis
Weaning failure due to isolated residual diaphragmatic paralysis after cervical spinal cord ischemia following aortic surgery- a case report (2024)

FAQs

What is spinal cord ischemia after surgery? ›

Iatrogenic Causes of Spinal Cord Ischemia

Aortic surgery has long had recognition as a risk factor for spinal cord stroke. Spinal cord ischemia can occur during both cross-clamping and de-clamping, the latter due to abrupt reperfusion of the viscera and resultant hyperperfusion of radicular arteries.

What is spinal cord ischemia after aortic dissection? ›

Aortic dissection (AD) is a serious condition that causes transient or permanent neurological problems that include spinal cord ischemia (SCI), which occurs when AD extends into the descending aorta resulting in insufficient perfusion of segmental arteries that supplies the spinal cord.

What is the risk of spinal cord ischemia after Tevar? ›

In a recent meta-analysis comparing TEVAR with open surgery for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs), the overall incidence of SCI after TEVAR was 3.4% compared with 8.2% after open surgery [1]. However, SCI is a serious complication after TEVAR, and quality of life is reduced in patients with SCI.

Can you recover from spinal cord ischemia? ›

The severity can vary, and while many patients make some functional recovery, permanent and disabling neurologic deficits remain in many.

What is ischemia of the cervical spine? ›

(Ischemic Myelopathy)

Spinal cord infarction usually results from ischemia originating in an extravertebral artery. Symptoms include sudden and severe back pain, followed immediately by rapidly progressive bilateral flaccid limb weakness and loss of sensation, particularly for pain and temperature. Diagnosis is by MRI.

What part of spinal cord is most as risk for ischemia? ›

Spinal Cord Injury

Although the posterior spinal arteries have rich collateral circulation, the anterior spinal artery has a much less efficient collateral circulation, and so the tissue it supplies is more vulnerable to ischemia. The anterior spinal artery supplies the anterior two thirds of the spinal cord.

Can a spinal cord injury stop your heart? ›

Bradycardia is the most common form of dysrhythmia developing after disruption of the sympathetic pathway by a spinal cord injury (SCI), and it can have fatal consequences, including cardiac arrest.

What are the cardiovascular diseases after spinal cord injury? ›

According to previous studies, morbidity from cardiovascular causes, particularly coronary artery disease, is higher, and coronary artery disease tends to occur earlier and progress more rapidly in SCI survivors than in the non-SCI population.

What is the most severe complication of a spinal cord injury? ›

SCIs can have severe complications, many of which are permanent. SCIs commonly cause a partial or total loss of abilities in body parts below the injury. That can cause certain forms of paralysis: Tetraplegia (sometimes known as “quadriplegia”): This is paralysis from the neck down.

What are the complications of spinal drainage after aortic surgery? ›

Severe complications associated with spinal drain placement have an incidence of 2.5–4.2% and include epidural hematoma, intracranial hemorrhage, neurologic deficits, herniation and infectious processes including meningitis.

What is the mortality rate of TEVAR? ›

Results: A total of 69 suitable studies published between 1998 and 2013 (1,574 patients) were examined including 1 randomized control trial, 55 retrospective studies, 3 prospective, 1 mixed, and 9 case reports. Overall mortality and morbidity rates for TEVAR was 8.07% (n = 127) and 30.8% (n = 485), respectively.

Can surgery cause ischemia? ›

Some medical procedures, like dialysis or surgery, can cause constriction in mesenteric blood vessels. Health conditions. Problems like sepsis, heart attack, dehydration and allergic reactions can all contribute to acute mesenteric ischemia.

What is spinal cord ischemia in EVAR? ›

Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a serious complication of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR). It remains underreported in the literature, and its pathophysiology is not fully elucidated.

How to prevent spinal cord ischemia? ›

suggest that mild intraoperative hypothermia, keeping body temperature between 32-35 °C, could improve spinal cord ischemic tolerance and aid in preventing SCI.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Foster Heidenreich CPA

Last Updated:

Views: 6057

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (56 voted)

Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Foster Heidenreich CPA

Birthday: 1995-01-14

Address: 55021 Usha Garden, North Larisa, DE 19209

Phone: +6812240846623

Job: Corporate Healthcare Strategist

Hobby: Singing, Listening to music, Rafting, LARPing, Gardening, Quilting, Rappelling

Introduction: My name is Foster Heidenreich CPA, I am a delightful, quaint, glorious, quaint, faithful, enchanting, fine person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.